The person claiming these avengers/bruce banner actor swap related quarms claims :
“it takes away some of the realism that one of the main characters is completely different in these series of films its like they dont care that hulk is just a minor role that they will change him and do as they please just fucking stupid its fine the way it was”
I’ll just bullet point the rediculousness of this. cause I cant be arsed contructing a paragraph, its sunday man.
- They do care and intended to use norton, due to either contractual or creative differences (depending on wether you take marvel or nortons story as truth) he dropped out and was replaced by mr mark ruffalo, who is still a bitchin actor
- James bond, Every shakespeare, fairy tale, historical ect ect bascially there are hundreds of characters portrayed in adaptations in which where different actors have play them, james bond is a prime example.
- My arguement is that the most important thing is the script and its director, if they are poor then an actor can only hold so much weight in a film (see: Iron man 2, spiderman 3, x-men 3) Brosman is my favourite bond, however none of his films are my favourites.
I could rant on, but do you really care my friends? I’m just ranting haha, Stupid people are what heavily tempts me to just cut off ties from facebook.
Hope people are having a good sunday xD